One for the Inside, Two for the Outside

I wanted to mention that the "third eye" experience I had last week was a one-time occurrence, so far. The event hasn't repeated, and apparently can't be willed into happening.

What surprised me about it was that it seems to be strictly an inside job. I always thought that if and when the third eye manifested it would be on the other side of the bone, on the outside, the way it is in the pictures. Instead it's very much in and of the inner being, and my one, brief experience of it found it looking inward, not at all out at the external world.

I always assumed that such an experience would change the way the world looks, but that didn't happen at all.

Maybe it will happen eventually, but for right now I remain convinced that this is a really crappy world we live in, mainly because of the way people treat each other. It's a world in which war and economic exploitation cause immense amounts of unnecessary suffering. If we were living in God's world, it would be different, but we're not. Take a look around you; this world we're in was made by us, not by God. Walk down a city street, and God's presence is there in a few blades of grass and the occasional tree or wild mouse. And maybe deep in our own, bruised, suffering souls as well. But for the most part we live in a world of concrete, exhaust fumes, and meanness.

In order to get to God's world I'd have to travel way out on the Olympic Peninsula, and even there would be exposed to the effects of air and water pollution and deforestation.

This is why I get annoyed when I read or hear the phrase, "Suffering is caused by attachment." It implies that all suffering is caused by attachment, but the truth is that much suffering is existential. The people gassed and incinerated at Auschwitz didn't suffer because they adopted a less-than-useful attitude. A guy who's lost his job at Ford and has a family to support might be said to suffer because he's attached to feeding his kids, but what's the alternative to that?

If a guy gets the flu, he suffers because he's sick, not because he's attached. And of course, while we can always make a bad situation worse by hanging on to a lousy attitude and, say, wallowing in self-pity rather than resolving to do what one needs to do to get well quickly, the root cause of that kind of suffering is existential.

I noticed that Desikachar handles this subject with much more discrimination than I usually encounter, and stresses that if we dedicate ourselves to the practices he teaches, we may be able to "reduce suffering." That's a much more realistic attitude.

And in a world of crap, it's an important distinction.

No practice this morning. I'm in Seattle for a five-hour workshop at the studio, and we'll have a short practice there.